Tesla has asked the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) not to roll back current vehicle emissions standards, a position that sets it apart from other major automakers who want to see the rules eased. Tesla’s request comes the same week that President Donald Trump, who Tesla CEO Elon Musk spent $300 million to help elect, told the United Nations General Assembly that he believes climate change is a “con job” and a “scam.” Tesla also asked the EPA not to scuttle a 2009 legal standard known as the Endangerment Finding, which serves as the foundation for many modern environmental regulations. In its letter to the agency, Tesla said that the finding is “based on a robust factual and scientific record.”
The EPA has been seeking public comment since August on these proposed changes to environmental rules. The agency’s administrator, Lee Zeldin, said at the time that if the rollbacks were to pass, they would drive “a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion.” While Tesla is asking for the standards to be maintained, the company told the EPA it is “open to discussing mechanisms to streamline” them in order to keep them in place.
The Financial Incentives Behind Tesla’s Stance
Tesla’s stated mission is to “accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.” However, the company also benefits financially from stricter environmental regulations. When other automakers fall short of their fleet emissions goals, they are often required to pay companies like Tesla hundreds of millions of dollars to buy “credits” to make up the difference. These credits technically come from a California program that has also been a target for some Republicans. This revenue stream is a significant factor in Tesla’s profitability, and its stance on maintaining the emissions standards aligns directly with its financial interests.
What The Author Thinks
Tesla’s request to the EPA highlights a tension between its stated public mission and its private financial interests. While the company’s public mission is to accelerate the transition to sustainable energy, its stance on emissions standards is also a self-serving business decision. By asking for the rules to be maintained, Tesla is protecting a key revenue stream from emissions credit sales, which makes it a powerful political force in the climate debate. This move shows that even a company founded on an environmental mission will ultimately act in its own economic best interest, which is a reminder that in today’s political landscape, environmental policy and corporate profitability are often intertwined.
Featured image credit: harry_nl via Flickr
For more stories like it, click the +Follow button at the top of this page to follow us.