DMR News

Advancing Digital Conversations

Regulatory Investigation Unveils $241 Million Accounting Discrepancy at Zee

ByDayne Lee

Feb 22, 2024

Regulatory Investigation Unveils $241 Million Accounting Discrepancy at Zee

India’s market regulator has uncovered a significant hole of more than US$240 million in the accounts of Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd, dealing yet another blow to the beleaguered media conglomerate. This revelation comes less than a month after Zee’s proposed merger with Sony Group Corp’s local unit collapsed, further exacerbating the company’s woes. Consequently, Zee shares experienced a notable decline following the announcement.

Magnitude of the Discrepancy

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), in its investigation into the Zee founders, discovered that approximately 20 billion rupees (equivalent to approximately US$240 million) may have been diverted from the company’s accounts. This staggering amount represents a substantial increase from initial estimates, underscoring the severity of the financial irregularities under scrutiny.

Market Response and Company Reaction

Following the disclosure of the accounting discrepancy, Zee’s shares witnessed a sharp decline of up to 15% in Mumbai trading, marking the most significant drop in a month. However, the benchmark S&P BSE Sensex experienced marginal gains during this period. The exact figure of the missing funds remains subject to change pending further review by Sebi, particularly after the completion of responses from company executives.

Sebi has been actively engaging with senior officials at Zee, including founders Subhash Chandra and his son Punit Goenka, as well as select board members, to solicit explanations regarding the identified financial irregularities. Meanwhile, Zee has refrained from commenting directly on the fund diversion allegations but asserted its cooperation with Sebi’s ongoing investigation.

Impact on Zee’s Leadership and Merger Prospects

These latest developments compound the challenges facing Punit Goenka, Zee’s CEO, who has been endeavoring to restore investor confidence following the collapse of the proposed US$10 billion merger with Sony. The termination of the merger deal in January, after a protracted stalemate over leadership matters, has left Zee grappling with uncertainties about its strategic direction and future partnerships.

Despite reports suggesting potential re-engagement with Sony to explore revival options for the merger, significant differences between the two entities persist. Zee clarified in a filing that it is not currently engaged in negotiations to revive the deal, indicating the complexity and uncertainty surrounding future collaborations.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Legal Battles

The regulatory scrutiny surrounding the alleged financial improprieties involving the father-and-son duo, Subhash Chandra and Punit Goenka, has been a source of contention between Zee and Sony since mid-2023. Sebi’s order in August, which barred the Zee founders from holding executive or director positions in any listed firm, underscored the seriousness of the allegations.

Zee subsequently appealed Sebi’s order, securing a partial reprieve in October allowing Goenka to retain an executive position pending the outcome of the investigation. However, the ongoing legal battles and regulatory challenges have cast a shadow over Zee’s leadership stability and corporate governance practices.

Financial Implications and Strategic Considerations

The proposed merger with Sony was anticipated to bolster both entities, offering Sony access to Zee’s extensive content library in regional Indian languages while enhancing Zee’s financial prospects. However, Zee’s financial performance has been lackluster, with a steep decline in full-year profit and mixed quarterly results, further highlighting the urgency for strategic initiatives to restore profitability and investor confidence.


Featured image credit: mehaniq41 via Adobe Stock

Dayne Lee

With a foundation in financial day trading, I transitioned to my current role as an editor, where I prioritize accuracy and reader engagement in our content. I excel in collaborating with writers to ensure top-quality news coverage. This shift from finance to journalism has been both challenging and rewarding, driving my commitment to editorial excellence.