DMR News

Advancing Digital Conversations

Singapore’s regulatory authority for competition scrutinized the possible Grab and Delivery Hero agreement.

ByYasmeeta Oon

Apr 10, 2024
Singapore's regulatory authority for competition scrutinized the possible Grab and Delivery Hero agreement.

Singapore’s regulatory authority for competition scrutinized the possible Grab and Delivery Hero agreement.

In a move aimed at safeguarding fair competition within Singapore’s burgeoning food delivery market, the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) recently concluded its investigation into discussions between Grab Holdings and Delivery Hero. The now-collapsed talks had sparked concerns about monopolistic tendencies and market domination.

The CCCS initiated its inquiry in early January, prompted by reports of Delivery Hero’s intentions to divest its foodpanda business in select Southeast Asian markets, with Singapore-based Grab touted as a possible suitor. At the time, industry analysts estimated that Grab and foodpanda jointly held a staggering 91% share of Singapore’s $2.5 billion food delivery sector. Momentum Works, a reputable research firm, further delineated that Grab alone commanded a formidable 63% market share.

  • Grab and foodpanda dominated Singapore’s food delivery market, posing potential competition concerns.
  • Delivery Hero’s plans to offload its Southeast Asian operations intensified speculation regarding market restructuring.
  • Industry analysts scrutinized the implications of a potential merger on consumer choice and pricing dynamics.

The CCCS officially closed its investigation on Feb. 23, following Delivery Hero’s decision to abandon the proposed sale. Simultaneously, Grab clarified that it had no ongoing negotiations regarding the acquisition of foodpanda. The collapse of talks in early February marked a significant development in the landscape of Southeast Asia’s food delivery industry.

  • Stakeholders closely monitored regulatory deliberations amidst the evolving competitive landscape.
  • Concerns over monopolistic tendencies prompted calls for stringent antitrust measures to preserve market equilibrium.
  • Industry players weighed potential implications on consumer welfare and market innovation.
Implications for Grab and Delivery Hero
  • Both Grab and Delivery Hero faced scrutiny over their strategic intentions and market dominance.
  • The failed negotiations underscored the complexities of consolidation within Southeast Asia’s dynamic food delivery market.
  • Regulatory interventions sought to balance industry consolidation with fostering competition and innovation.

The closure of the CCCS investigation signifies a pivotal moment in Singapore’s ongoing efforts to uphold competition principles within its food delivery ecosystem. As industry dynamics continue to evolve, regulatory oversight remains critical in ensuring a level playing field for market participants and fostering consumer welfare.

Market Share Analysis

CompanyMarket Share

Through diligent scrutiny and proactive regulatory measures, Singapore’s competition watchdog reaffirms its commitment to fostering a competitive marketplace conducive to innovation and consumer choice. As Grab, Delivery Hero, and other industry stakeholders navigate the evolving landscape, regulatory oversight remains paramount in safeguarding the interests of all market participants.

Related News:

Featured Image courtesy of

Yasmeeta Oon

Just a girl trying to break into the world of journalism, constantly on the hunt for the next big story to share.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *