Former FBI Director James Comey pleaded not guilty on Wednesday morning to federal criminal charges that President Donald Trump had publicly sought. Judge Michael Nachmanoff set Comey’s trial to begin on January 5 in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Virginia. Comey’s lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, and prosecutors estimate the trial will last only two to three days.
Allegations of Political Prosecution
Comey, who was fired as FBI director by President Trump in 2017, faces charges of making a false statement and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. The charges stem from a September 30, 2020, appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee, during which Comey denied authorizing someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source for news reports about the probe into Hillary Clinton and her emails.
Fitzgerald immediately signaled his intent to challenge the case, announcing he will soon file legal papers requesting that the charges be tossed on the grounds of vindictive and selective prosecution. Fitzgerald also stated he plans to file motions addressing what he called “abuse” of the grand jury, which was personally asked by the newly appointed U.S. Attorney to issue the indictment, and “outrageous government conduct.”
Court Dismisses Claims of Complexity
The prosecution’s handling of the case has raised eyebrows. Two federal prosecutors from North Carolina were assigned to handle the matter, a move widely interpreted as evidence that the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Lindsey Halligan, had difficulty getting local prosecutors to work on the politically charged case. Halligan was appointed by President Trump shortly after her predecessor resigned, reportedly due to reluctance to seek an indictment of Comey. Fitzgerald told the court that Halligan’s appointment itself was “unlawful.”
In court, Judge Nachmanoff and Comey’s lawyer both dismissed the prosecution’s claim that the case was complex and would involve a large volume of classified information. “We view this as a simple case,” Fitzgerald said. Judge Nachmanoff concurred, stating, “This does not appear to me to be an overly complicated case.” He warned the prosecutors that he would “not slow this case down because the government does not promptly turn everything over,” emphasizing the legal requirement for the prosecution to quickly provide all evidence (discovery) to Comey’s defense team before trial.
After being indicted in late September, Comey posted a video response on social media stating, “I am not afraid.” He affirmed his stance against the administration: “My family and I have known for years that there are costs to standing up to Donald Trump. But we couldn’t imagine ourselves living any other way. We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn’t either.”
Author’s Opinion
The prosecution of James Comey is clearly tainted by the overt political motives of the Trump administration, a fact explicitly highlighted by his defense counsel and tacitly acknowledged by the presiding judge’s skepticism toward the prosecution’s claims of complexity. The rush to indict right before the statute of limitations expired, following the politically motivated replacement of a top federal prosecutor, serves as stark evidence that the Justice Department is being leveraged for political retribution. Fitzgerald’s motion for vindictive prosecution will force a rare public examination of whether the criminal justice system was weaponized by the White House, posing a severe challenge to the principle of prosecutorial independence.
Featured image credit: Heute
For more stories like it, click the +Follow button at the top of this page to follow us.