DMR News

Advancing Digital Conversations

Amazon Claims No Responsibility for Hazardous Products in Ongoing Legal Battle

ByHilary Ong

Mar 21, 2025

Amazon Claims No Responsibility for Hazardous Products in Ongoing Legal Battle

Amazon has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) over its order demanding the recall of hazardous products sold through Amazon’s platform. The lawsuit, which was filed in Maryland last week, argues that Amazon’s role as a logistics provider for these products should absolve it of responsibility for the recall. According to Amazon, the CPSC has the authority to issue recall orders to manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, but not to third-party logistics providers who store and transport products.

The Origin of the Case

The case stems from 2021 when the CPSC sued Amazon for selling over 400,000 units of hazardous products, including faulty carbon monoxide detectors, unsafe hair dryers, and children’s sleepwear violating federal safety standards. These products were sold between 2019 and 2021 and were flagged as posing substantial risks under the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA). While Amazon eventually blocked the sale of these products and notified customers, the CPSC found issues with how Amazon handled the recall. Specifically, the agency claimed that Amazon downplayed the severity of the hazards and only offered gift cards instead of full refunds or replacements for the affected products.

Amazon’s Stance on the Matter

In its legal challenge, Amazon asserts that it is merely a logistics provider and not responsible for the safety of the products sold through its Fulfilled by Amazon (FBA) program. The company argues that the CPSC only has authority to issue recall orders to manufacturers, distributors, or retailers, and not to logistics providers. Amazon further claims that the CPSC’s lawsuit is part of a broader effort to extend its authority over online marketplaces.

Consumer safety advocates argue that Amazon’s refusal to take responsibility for the recall is problematic. William Wallace, the director of safety advocacy for Consumer Reports, criticized Amazon for its actions, stating that the company has fought the CPSC’s efforts for over three years. He contends that Amazon should not be exempt from recall requirements simply because it operates an online marketplace, especially when it comes to removing hazardous products from consumers’ homes.

Author’s Opinion

The ongoing legal battle between Amazon and the CPSC highlights an important issue regarding accountability in online marketplaces. While Amazon may argue that it is merely a logistics provider, the reality is that the company profits from these transactions and has a responsibility to ensure the safety of products sold on its platform. A failure to uphold consumer safety standards can undermine trust in the e-commerce ecosystem, making it essential for platforms like Amazon to take a more proactive role in product safety.


Featured image credit: Vitya_maly via GoodFon

Follow us for more breaking news on DMR

Hilary Ong

Hello, from one tech geek to another. Not your beloved TechCrunch writer, but a writer with an avid interest in the fast-paced tech scenes and all the latest tech mojo. I bring with me a unique take towards tech with a honed applied psychology perspective to make tech news digestible. In other words, I deliver tech news that is easy to read.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *