DMR News

Advancing Digital Conversations

Judge Says Musk’s Role at DOGE Is “Continuous and Permanent”

ByYasmeeta Oon

May 30, 2025

Judge Says Musk’s Role at DOGE Is “Continuous and Permanent”

A Washington, D.C., federal judge ruled Tuesday that Elon Musk’s role leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) extends well beyond a temporary advisory position, contradicting the White House’s claims that his role was brief and limited.

In February, a coalition of 14 states, led by New Mexico, sued Musk, DOGE, and President Donald Trump, alleging constitutional violations. The states argue Musk lacks legal authority to enact sweeping federal changes because he was never Senate-confirmed, and that DOGE was not authorized by Congress.

The White House attempted to have the case dismissed by framing Musk’s role as a temporary, advisory position without formal authority.

Judge Tanya Chutkan’s Findings

Judge Chutkan rejected the White House’s characterization, stating that Musk’s influence “extends throughout the executive branch” without clear limits. She found the states’ claim credible that Musk “occupies a continuing position” and exercises substantial power despite lacking proper congressional appointment.

The court also found that allegations of DOGE gaining unauthorized access to private government data sufficiently demonstrate potential harm, allowing the case to proceed.

While Musk remains a defendant, Judge Chutkan dismissed President Trump, citing constitutional protections that prevent the court from enjoining the President’s official duties. She acknowledged the President’s broad discretionary authority over appointments under the Constitution.

Since his appointment, Musk has led efforts to enforce fiscal discipline by eliminating federal offices, cutting regulations, downsizing the workforce, and modifying government systems and websites—actions that have drawn legal scrutiny.

What The Author Thinks

This case underscores the challenges of unelected individuals wielding significant government authority without formal oversight. While efficiency and innovation are important, Musk’s unconfirmed position raises serious questions about checks and balances. Democracies require transparent appointments to ensure accountability, especially when sweeping changes to federal agencies are at stake.


Featured image credit: Heute

For more stories like it, click the +Follow button at the top of this page to follow us.

Yasmeeta Oon

Just a girl trying to break into the world of journalism, constantly on the hunt for the next big story to share.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *